Monthly Archive for September, 2008

101 Reasons to Abolish School Boards 1-4

 

101 Reasons to Abolish School Boards (Boards of Education, Local Education Authorities….)

    1. An unnecessary level of government

If private and independent schools can operate efficiently with parents as unpaid school boards at each individual school, hiring, firing, etc., why can’t public schools?


    2. Politics of lay acquiescence

Well-meaning lay people run for school boards hoping to have a say on behalf of parents and children for better education.  How long does it take for a turnaround — before they become socialized, domesticated puppets of the establishment and against parents. I’ve talked to trustees and some actually warn that the system has to be protected from parents, that they have to work for the "community".  How is it that the trustees are to be the gatekeepers, the barricade against parents and the public?  Don’t they see that they themselves have fallen into place as puppets and kept at "arms length"?  What kind of "training" or "re-education" do these trustees get? (Please see post for Sept 10/08 and the accompanying visual about a 1986 "training".


   3. Conflict of Interest of trustees

Look at your list of present trustees?  How many are teachers or ex-teachers or principals?  How many are ex teacher union leaders? Some jurisdictions see the danger and have strong conflict-of-interest prohibitions in regulations and legislation. Not in BC.


   4. Trusteeship just a stepping stone to senior politics

How many senior politicians do you know who started out as trustees?  It’s a great training school for politics.  You learn to schmooze, to pull strings, to wheedle, to promise…….You learn who the power brokers are in the community as trustees get their share of attending so many committees directly unrelated to education:  health, parks and recreation, municipal leadership training camps, …..You deal with provincial and federal politicians and bureaucrats as you seek grants and favors, funds and tax benefits….

 

 

“Handling” Parents

New Trustees Seminar - 1986, Vancouver, BC, Canada

The BCSTA (BC School Trustee Association) REPORT 1986-01-10 was headed

New Trustees Seminar

Empathize, Don’t Antagonize

"……irate parent Mrs. Trueguard flounced onstage quivering with ostrich feathers and indignation about her son’s missing biology credit…..".  The story further described the "training" exercises the new trustees experienced while receiving "some cool-headed, diplomatic and effective problem-solving."

I chanced upon this article in 1986 as a young parent and was insulted then, and continue to be offended to this day.

But, this example does answer some of my questions.  How do well-intentioned new trustees so quickly become establishment types rather than champions of parents and students?  Why do some say, "We have to protect the system from parents."

How would you, if a parent, like to be caricatured in such a manner, the National Enquirer in hand? Mrs. Trueguard is not a very nice looking parent nor does she appear real.  I think this demonizes parents in the eyes of trustee trainees. Aren’t any trustees parents anymore?

It’s ridiculously inappropriate  and if I was  elected school trustee I would  carefully  monitor how new trustees are "trained".

Perhaps some current trustees might let us know, or are they sworn to secrecy about their "training" and "conversion"?