Monthly Archive for December, 2006

Abolish School Boards

Press Release April 24, 1985

A parents rights advocate today called for the dismantling of the school board system as one way to help youth better prepare for the future. Mrs. Audain, Co-ordinator of an advocacy service for parents said school boards have become irrelevant to education and in fact were an obstacle to meeting student needs. By being a buffer between parents and their schools, school boards prevented alienated parents from their duty to obtain the best education for their children. Mrs. Audain said with the removal of school boards, parents would then sit on the managing boards of individual schools and would achieve far greater responsiveness than the present arm’s length system now in place. The school board is a totally unnecessary level of government, which is not only expensive and over-administered but also susceptible to partisan politics and captive of many vested interest groups such as teacher unions. Parents are told to leave education to the experts but those who feel they should be involved too often are made to feel inadequate and unwelcome. With this hands-off attitude, parents become deskilled in their competencies and the cumulative effect is that parents fail to be useful resources to their children in career planning, character-building and employment seeking. "Parents cannot take their meaningful role in supervising their children’s education as long as we have this colonial structure called school boards telling parents what’s best for them" says Mrs. Audain.

Abolish School Boards

In reading Myron Lieberman’s excellent book, Public Education: An Autopsy (1993), he recommends that school boards be abolished as one item in a list of recommendations to make education more responsive to the consumer.

24. School boards should be abolished or appointed by mayors, not elected in "non-partisan" elections in which the organized producers have more influence than the unorganized consumers. (p277)

I attach my letter to the editor published in the North Shore News, June 05/00. I had as yet not read Lieberman’s book with all his compiled research but I came to this conclusion watching school affairs for 30 years. In future I will attach earlier works of mine dealing with this topic.

GET RID OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES Dear Editor: The many issues in our public schools that continue to trouble us: poor communication, unresponsiveness, discouragement of parent volunteers, trustees’ expensive retreats, etc. are not new. When I was an active parent volunteer there was an occasion when we were even called "scabs" (North Shore News, front page story, Jan 5, 1983). Another time when parents stated they liked sports days for their kids, a principal told us that staff did not like them as it was an opportunity to compare notes. So resentment of parent volunteers is not just about jobs! We can go back to 1976 when an international report of Canadian public education systems found school boards dealing with "fringe" matters rather than the substance of education and learning. "Parents complain that the school boards are remote and take no notice of them." (OECD Report of Educational Policy in Canada, 1976). Parents and the public have a long history of suffering under our present archaic system of educational governance. It is an industrial model and completely out of date with modern times. It produces layers and layers of obstacles and busy work for the industry, while parents and teachers are artificially kept from having meaningful relationships. It is the structure that needs to be changed. We need to abolish politically elected school trustees who so-called "govern" over a whole district and have parents as unpaid governors of their own individual schools, similar to the structure in private schools. Elected trustees are "babes-in-the-woods" when it comes to dealing with employee groups and unions. They are easily overwhelmed and taken advantage of. How can they keep ahead of the professional advice, persistence, and knowledge build-up of the union groups? The benefits of such a change would be immense: accountability, responsiveness, cost saving, efficiency, etc. Tunya Audain West Vancouver